The Coinformer banner
Live 5m

Just 2 of 142 jurisdictions have licensed a DeFi protocol, FATF finds

Regulators are struggling to find anyone to license in the DeFi sector, built to operate without a conventional company in charge.

Egor Komarov/Unsplash

Discuss this article:

Does this story need context? Notes are selected by independent community ratings, not editors.
How it works

DeFi regulation remains almost nonexistent worldwide, with only four jurisdictions requiring DeFi protocols covered by their crypto rules to obtain a license or register, and just two doing so in practice, The Coinformer has learned after reviewing a new report from the Financial Action Task Force, an intergovernmental anti-money-laundering watchdog.

  • Only 26 of the 142 jurisdictions surveyed had assessed DeFi's money-laundering and terrorist-financing risks, while another 12 were working on an assessment.
  • Meanwhile, 132 jurisdictions (or 93%) hadn't identified any DeFi protocol operating within their borders that qualified as a crypto service provider.

The main obstacle is deciding who's responsible for a supposedly decentralized protocol. As FATF explained, regulators struggle to determine whether developers or DAO bodies exercise enough control to be held accountable.

"Jurisdictions report persistent difficulties in identifying qualifying DeFi arrangements within their regulatory perimeter, due to their cross-border nature, frequent lack of formal legal structures, and the absence of clear regulatory anchors."

FATF
FATF's rules apply when identifiable people control a DeFi protocol or when a platform is centralized in practice
Fully decentralized protocols remain outside those rules. Only one jurisdiction reported taking enforcement action against a DeFi project.
  • FATF's figures were based on self-reported survey responses that weren't independently verified.